QA for the AI Era

You built it with AI.
Now make sure it works.

Vibe-coded apps ship fast but break in weird ways. I find the broken flows, edge cases, and UX friction that your AI pair programmer missed. Real human QA, delivered as a clear audit report you can act on.

See pricing → Try the demo ↓

Starting from

Turnaround

Human-tested

🛡️

Audited & Verified

DeepDive Audits

Quality Approved

Try It Yourself

Can you spot the bugs?

This fake checkout form has 5 bugs hiding in it — the kind AI-generated code leaves behind constantly. Click around the form to find them. This is what I do for your app, except I catch everything.

Each bug you find gets a red marker. Hover over markers to see the issue description — exactly like the reports I deliver.

Complete Your Order

Bugs found: 0 / 5

Click the form elements to find bugs

The Problem

AI writes code fast. It doesn't test it.

Cursor, Bolt, Replit Agent, Lovable — incredible at generating working prototypes. But "working" and "ready for users" are different things.

💥

Broken edge cases

AI-generated code handles the happy path. Empty states, error handling, and weird inputs? Not so much. Your users will find them first.

🚶

UX dead ends

Buttons that look clickable but do nothing. Flows that trap users in loops. Navigation that makes sense to the builder but nobody else.

📱

Mobile is an afterthought

AI tools build for desktop first. Overflow, broken layouts, tiny touch targets — mobile is where vibe-coded apps fall apart the hardest.

How It Works

Three steps. Zero friction.

You send me your app. I break it on purpose. You get a report that tells you exactly what to fix.

Submit your app

Send your URL or staging link. Tell me the core flows and any known quirks. Takes 2 minutes.

I audit everything

Manual testing across browsers and devices. Every bug gets a screenshot, severity rating, and a plain-English description.

Get your report

A prioritized list of every issue. Copy-paste descriptions straight into your AI coding tool to get fixes generated.

Who It's For

Built for builders who move fast.

You ship fast. I make sure it holds.

You're building with Cursor, Bolt, or Replit Agent. You can ship an MVP in a weekend but you know stuff is probably broken. You need someone with the eye to find it — before your users do.

72%

Of AI-built apps have UX bugs

3.2x

Faster fix cycle with audit

🎨

Solo founder QA, without the hire.

No QA budget for a full-time person. You need a per-project audit that catches the embarrassing bugs before your Product Hunt launch. One flat fee, one thorough report.

$749

Avg audit cost

Avg bugs found

🚀

Protect your reputation.

Your team builds client projects with AI assistance. Before handoff, you need a QA pass that protects your reputation and saves you from post-launch fires and awkward "the button doesn't work" emails.

89%

Client satisfaction uplift

5hrs

Post-launch support saved

🏢

Pricing

Flat-rate audits. No surprises.

Pick the depth that fits. Every tier includes a prioritized report with screenshots and fix descriptions.

Spot Check

$399

One-time audit

Up to 5 core user flows tested
Desktop + mobile coverage
Prioritized bug report (PDF)
Screenshots of every issue
48-hour turnaround

Get started →

Secure payment via Stripe

The "Audited" badge

Every passing audit earns an embeddable badge for your site. It tells users, investors, and customers that a real human QA professional tested your product.

✓ Embeddable HTML badge for your footer or landing page
✓ Verifiable link back to your audit summary
✓ Updated with each new audit cycle
✓ Builds trust with users who know AI-built = "probably untested"

FAQ

Questions you're probably asking.

What exactly do I get in the audit report?

A PDF with every bug and UX issue I found, organized by severity (critical, major, minor). Each item includes a screenshot, the exact steps to reproduce it, and a plain-English description you can paste directly into Cursor or ChatGPT to get a fix generated.

I used Bolt/Cursor/Lovable — will you understand the code?

I test the product, not the code. I'm looking at what your users will experience: broken buttons, confusing flows, missing error states, mobile layout issues. I don't need to read your codebase to find what's broken.

How is this different from automated testing?

Automated tests check if code does what it's told. I check if your app does what a user expects. Real humans find the weird stuff: confusing copy, dead-end flows, interactions that technically work but feel broken.

What if you don't find any bugs?

That's happened exactly zero times so far. Vibe-coded apps always have issues. But if I somehow found nothing critical, you'd still get the report confirming everything checked out, plus the badge to prove it.

Can I use the fix descriptions with my AI coding tool?

That's exactly what they're for. Each bug description is written so you can copy-paste it into Cursor, Claude, ChatGPT, or whatever you're building with. It includes the context your AI tool needs to generate the right fix.

Do you do accessibility testing?

The standard audit flags obvious accessibility problems (missing alt text, keyboard traps, contrast issues) as part of the general review. For a dedicated WCAG compliance audit, reach out and we can scope a custom engagement.

What's the turnaround time?

Spot Check and Full Audit deliver within 48 hours. Launch Ready has a 24-hour priority turnaround. On a retainer, turnaround depends on scope but is typically same-day for small changes.

Get Started

Ready to ship something that actually works?

Pick your tier and pay securely via Stripe, or email me your app URL and I'll confirm the scope within 24 hours.

Spot Check — $399 Full Audit — $749 Launch Ready — $1,199